Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
NLP is used as an example of pseudoscience for facilitating the teaching of scientific literacy at the professional and university level. [464] [469] [470] NLP also appears on peer-reviewed expert-consensus based lists of discredited interventions. [462]
Popper used astrology and psychoanalysis as examples of pseudoscience and Einstein's theory of relativity as an example of science. He subdivided non-science into philosophical, mathematical, mythological, religious and metaphysical formulations on one hand, and pseudoscientific formulations on the other.
The life expectancy among adults was much higher; a 21-year-old man in medieval England, for example, could expect to live to the age of 64. However, in various places and eras, life expectancy was noticeably lower. For example, monks often died in their 20s or 30s.
Pseudoscience is a broad group of theories or assertions about the natural world that claim or appear to be scientific, but that are not accepted as scientific by the scientific community. Pseudoscience does not include most obsolete scientific or medical theories (see Category:Obsolete scientific theories ), nor does it include every idea that ...
Examples of conditions that are not necessarily pseudoscientific include: Conditions determined to be somatic in nature, including mass psychogenic illnesses. Medicalized conditions that are not pathogenic in nature, such as aging, childbirth, pregnancy, sexual addiction, baldness, jet lag, and halitosis. [2]
About Category:Pseudoscience literature and related categories: This category's scope contains articles about Pseudoscience, which may be a contentious label. This category lists articles about literature that is considered to be pseudoscience .
For example, Lyell D. Henry Jr. wrote, "Fringe science [is] a term also suggesting kookiness." [ 6 ] This characterization is perhaps inspired by the eccentric behavior of many researchers of the kind known colloquially (and with considerable historical precedent) as mad scientists .
For example, in the article, Gardner writes: The reader may wonder why a competent scientist does not publish a detailed refutation of Reich's absurd biological speculations. The answer is that the informed scientist doesn't care, and would, in fact, damage his reputation by taking the time to undertake such a thankless task.