enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that any laws that try to restrict the political spending of corporations ...

  3. Citizens United (organization) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_(organization)

    Citizens United is a conservative 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization in the United States founded in 1988. In 2010, the organization won a U.S. Supreme Court case known as Citizens United v. FEC. The Court ruled that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from making independent expenditures in federal elections, citing First Amendment ...

  4. Moneyocracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moneyocracy

    Moneyocracy is a 2012 documentary film about Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , 558 U.S. 310 (2010), which was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions.

  5. Josh Hawley versus Citizens United: Great, but what game is ...

    www.aol.com/josh-hawley-versus-citizens-united...

    There’s plenty of reason to question the Missouri senator whose big business donations dried up after he tried to reinstall Donald Trump on Jan. 6, 2021. | Opinion

  6. Talk:Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Citizens_United_v._FEC

    After the District Court's decision on this matter, the question of whether the advertisements were prohibited under 2 U. S. C. §441b was not argued again. Indeed, the Supreme Court decision clearly states: "Citizens United sought to broadcast one 30-second and two 10-second ads to promote Hillary.

  7. American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Tradition...

    While the Citizens United decision initially appeared to apply equally to state contests, [20] the Supreme Court ruled in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock that the Citizens United holding does so by applying it to Montana state law. [4] Because the Citizens United decision supersedes state law, [21] the states cannot bar ...

  8. Hillary: The Movie - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary:_The_Movie

    In December 2007, Citizens United v.Federal Election Commission. was filed at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A special three-judge panel (as specified in BCRA) sided with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) that under the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, Hillary: The Movie could not be shown on television right before the 2008 Democratic primaries.

  9. Oldest Latino civil rights group announces its first ...

    www.aol.com/news/oldest-latino-civil-rights...

    LULAC, the oldest Latino civil rights organization, has broken with its past practice of not endorsing political candidates and are endorsing the Harris-Walz Democratic presidential ticket.