enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Nulla poena sine culpa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nulla_poena_sine_culpa

    Nulla poena sine culpa (Latin for "no punishment without fault" or "no punishment without culpability") or the guilt principle is a legal principle requiring that one cannot be punished for something that they are not guilty of.

  3. Not proven - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_proven

    Not proven (Scots: No pruiven, Scottish Gaelic: gun dearbhadh [1]) is a verdict available to a court of law in Scotland. Under Scots law, a criminal trial may end in one of three verdicts, one of conviction ("guilty") and two of acquittal ("not proven" and "not guilty"). [2] [3]

  4. Presumption of innocence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence

    The presumption of innocence is a legal principle that every person accused of any crime is considered innocent until proven guilty. Under the presumption of innocence, the legal burden of proof is thus on the prosecution , which must present compelling evidence to the trier of fact (a judge or a jury ).

  5. Coffin v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffin_v._United_States

    It is, of necessity, the condition of mind produced by the proof resulting from the evidence in the cause. It is the result of the proof, not the proof itself, whereas the presumption of innocence is one of the instruments of proof, going to bring about the proof from which reasonable doubt arises; thus one is a cause, the other an effect.

  6. Jury nullification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification

    Over time, juries have tended to favour the "not guilty" verdict over "not proven" and so the interpretation has changed. The "not guilty" verdict has become the normal verdict when a jury is convinced of innocence, and the "not proven" verdict is used only if the jury is not certain of innocence or guilt. [citation needed]

  7. Ignorantia juris non excusat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat

    In law, ignorantia juris non excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not"), [1] or ignorantia legis neminem excusat ("ignorance of law excuses no one"), [2] is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely by being unaware of its content.

  8. List of Latin legal terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_legal_terms

    An action is not given to one who is not injured. The requirement that in most private legal actions, the person bringing the action must have been damaged in some way. [2] Actus legis nemini facit injurium: The act of law injures no one. Actus non facit reum, nisi mens sit rea: No act is punishable that is not the result of a guilty mind.

  9. Actus reus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actus_reus

    In criminal law, actus reus (/ ˈ æ k t ə s ˈ r eɪ ə s /; pl.: actus rei), Latin for "guilty act", is one of the elements normally required to prove commission of a crime in common law jurisdictions, the other being Latin: mens rea ("guilty mind"). In the United States, it is sometimes called the external element or the objective element ...