Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Simply speaking, a number is normalized when it is written in the form of a × 10 n where 1 ≤ |a| < 10 without leading zeros in a. This is the standard form of scientific notation . An alternative style is to have the first non-zero digit after the decimal point.
Eliminate ambiguous or non-significant zeros by using Scientific Notation: For example, 1300 with three significant figures becomes 1.30 × 10 3. Likewise 0.0123 can be rewritten as 1.23 × 10 −2. The part of the representation that contains the significant figures (1.30 or 1.23) is known as the significand or mantissa.
Using the figures above, we can calculate the maximum pressure at various depths in an offshore oil well. Saltwater is 0.444 psi/ft (2.5% higher than fresh water but this not general and depends on salt concentration in water) Pore pressure in the rock could be as high as 1.0 psi/ft of depth (19.25 lb/gal)
In toxicology, the median lethal dose, LD 50 (abbreviation for "lethal dose, 50%"), LC 50 (lethal concentration, 50%) or LCt 50 is a toxic unit that measures the lethal dose of a given substance. [1]
The gamma function is an important special function in mathematics.Its particular values can be expressed in closed form for integer and half-integer arguments, but no simple expressions are known for the values at rational points in general.
The scientific journals published by the American Astronomical Society and the Royal Astronomical Society subsequently adopted this symbol. [3] [9] In the 2014 revision and 2019 edition of the SI Brochure, the BIPM used the unit symbol "au". [10] [11] ISO 80000-3:2019, which replaces ISO 80000-3:2006, does not mention the astronomical unit. [12 ...
No, the value given is correct (at least to the order of magnitude, I haven't checked past the first sig fig); note that it's 145 x 10^-6, not 1.45 x 10^-6. The table is using engineering notation, which keeps exponents to multiples of 3. I'm not very fond of engineering notation myself, but it's not actually wrong.
Another peculiarity in Japan is the existence of a popular version of data, which was tabulated in reference books such as the annual "Chronological Scientific Tables" (RCST1939(1938) [R 1]: E46 ), the "Dictionary of Physics and Chemistry" (IDPC(1939) [I 1]: app.VI ) and other prominent books on geochemistry and chemistry.