enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gibbons v. Ogden - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbons_v._Ogden

    Gibbons v. Ogden , 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, which is granted to the US Congress by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution , encompasses the power to regulate navigation.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 22

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...

  4. Rivers and Harbors Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivers_and_Harbors_Act

    River and Harbor Act of 1954, Title 1 of Pub. L. 83–780, September 3, 1954, Authorizing and appropriated funds for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors for navigation, flood control, and for other purposes, to include beach erosion. [21] Title 2 of PL 83-780 was the Flood Control Act of 1954.

  5. On March 2, 1824, the Supreme Court ruled in Gibbons v. Ogden, holding that Congress may regulate interstate commerce.

  6. Commerce Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause

    Thus, without being constitutionally obligated to pay compensation, the United States may change the course of a navigable stream, South Carolina v. Georgia, 93 U.S. 4 (1876), or otherwise impair or destroy a riparian owner's access to navigable waters, Gibson v. United States, 166 U.S. 269 (1897); Scranton v.

  7. Dormant Commerce Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dormant_Commerce_Clause

    See Western & Southern Life Ins. v. State Board of California, 451 U.S. 648 (1981). In this case the Dormant Commerce Clause is no longer "dormant" and the issue is a Commerce Clause issue, requiring a determination of whether Congress has approved, preempted, or left untouched the state law at issue.

  8. Marshall Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Court

    Johnson v. McIntosh (1823): In an opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the court held that private parties could not validly purchase land from Native Americans. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): In an opinion written by Chief Justice Marshall, the court struck down a New York law that had granted a monopoly on steamship operation in the state of ...

  9. Timeline of the history of the United States (1820–1859)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_history_of...

    1821 – Missouri becomes a state; 1821 – Florida becomes a U.S. territory; the 1819 Adams–Onís Treaty goes into effect; 1823 – Monroe Doctrine proclaimed; 1824 – Gibbons v. Ogden (22 US 1 1824) affirms federal over state authority in interstate commerce. Gibbons' business partner is Cornelius Vanderbilt.