enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Manual of Style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_style

    Editors should structure articles with consistent, reader-friendly layouts and formatting (which are detailed in this guide). Where more than one style or format is acceptable under the MoS, one should be used consistently within an article and should not be changed without good reason. Edit warring over stylistic choices is unacceptable. [b]

  3. Wikipedia : Manual of Style/Video games

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    This section should not contain excessive detail about the game's plot, descriptions about the setting, or game guide information. Reception: This should detail how the setting or aspects of the setting were received by critics. Criticism about the game itself should generally be omitted as the setting is the subject of the article.

  4. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Dashes

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    One solution might be to rewrite this page, but my view is that the use of hyphens and dashes is important enough to treat in more detail in the summary MOS. Such detail, I think, should at least match that in other sections (e.g., capital letters and italics). Tony 07:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC) I agree that this page is poor shape, Tony.

  5. Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 96 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    However, if one goes to the web site for Science magazine, and searchs for "naturally-occurring" with or without a hyphen, one finds that Science does not use the hyphen. The fact that one of the best science journals in the world does not use a hyphen suggest that this case is not an exception to the MOS rule.

  6. Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 125 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    The second one has a quote from the Chicago Manual of Style 14th ed., which also refers to these systems as American and British. That should satisfy everyone that I am not inventing an imaginary national difference. If you know of any sources that prove that they are not British and American, please provide them.

  7. Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 124 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    Following the dominant convention, a hyphen is used in compounded place names and language names, not an en dash. Guinea-Bissau; Austria-Hungary; an old Mon-Khmer dialect; Niger-Congo phonology; The en dash in all of the compounds above is unspaced. 3. Instead of a hyphen, where at least one component includes a space

  8. Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dashes archive 1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    "pre–World War II' is not a good example of the n dash, because there should be a hyphen here! I'm changing it to a correct example. Tony 02:26, 31 July 2005 (UTC) Actually, that example is correct. An en dash is used instead of a hyphen when one of the components is hypenated or contains more than one word. I will add a sentence clarifying this.

  9. Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places ...

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Hyphens_vs._dashes_issues

    After an editor has edited a disambiguation page to replace hyphens by dashes where they see fit, there is damage to the integrated system of links, for the case of Munroe–Dunlap–Snow House / Munroe-Dunlap-Snow House. The current status, as of 1/14/2017, is that the dashed version of name has one inbound link, from Snow House. The ...