enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Equivocation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation

    In logic, equivocation ("calling two different things by the same name") is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word or expression in multiple senses within an argument. [ 1 ][ 2 ] It is a type of ambiguity that stems from a phrase having two or more distinct meanings, not from the grammar or structure of the sentence. [ 1 ]

  3. Motte-and-bailey fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy

    The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities, one modest and easy to defend (the "motte") and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the "bailey"). [ 1 ] The arguer advances the controversial ...

  4. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Equivocation – using a term with more than one meaning in a statement without specifying which meaning is intended. [20] Ambiguous middle term – using a middle term with multiple meanings. [21] Definitional retreat – changing the meaning of a word when an objection is raised. [22]

  5. Informal fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_fallacy

    Traditionally, a great number of informal fallacies have been identified, including the fallacy of equivocation, the fallacy of amphiboly, the fallacies of composition and division, the false dilemma, the fallacy of begging the question, the ad hominem fallacy and the appeal to ignorance. There is no general agreement as to how the various ...

  6. Loaded question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

    Loaded question. A loaded question is a form of complex question that contains a controversial assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt). [ 1 ] Such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda. [ 2 ] The traditional example is the question "Have you ...

  7. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    An example is a probabilistically valid instance of the formally invalid argument form of denying the antecedent or affirming the consequent. [ 12 ] Thus, "fallacious arguments usually have the deceptive appearance of being good arguments, [ 13 ] because for most fallacious instances of an argument form, a similar but non-fallacious instance ...

  8. Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

    Argumentum ad populum is a type of informal fallacy, [1][14] specifically a fallacy of relevance, [15][16] and is similar to an argument from authority (argumentum ad verecundiam). [14][4][9] It uses an appeal to the beliefs, tastes, or values of a group of people, [12] stating that because a certain opinion or attitude is held by a majority ...

  9. Antanaclasis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antanaclasis

    Antanaclasis. In rhetoric, antanaclasis (/ æntəˈnækləsɪs, ˌæntænəˈklæsɪs /; from the Greek: ἀντανάκλασις, antanáklasis, meaning "reflection", [1] from ἀντί anti, "against", ἀνά ana, "up" and κλάσις klásis "breaking") is the literary trope in which a single word or phrase is repeated, but in two ...