enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  3. Ohio Revised Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Revised_Code

    The Ohio Revised Code (ORC) contains all current statutes of the Ohio General Assembly of a permanent and general nature, consolidated into provisions, titles, chapters and sections. [1] However, the only official publication of the enactments of the General Assembly is the Laws of Ohio; the Ohio Revised Code is only a reference. [2]

  4. Law of Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Ohio

    These are published in the official Laws of Ohio and are called "session laws". [2] These in turn have been codified in the Ohio Revised Code. [3] The only official publication of the enactments of the General Assembly is the Laws of Ohio; the Ohio Revised Code is only a reference. [4]

  5. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    However, under Federal Rule of Evidence 801 and the minority of U.S. jurisdictions that have adopted this rule, a prior inconsistent statement may be introduced as evidence of the truth of the statement itself if the prior statement was given in live testimony and under oath as part of a formal hearing, proceeding, trial, or deposition. [2]

  6. Four corners (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_corners_(law)

    The Four Corners Rule is a legal doctrine that courts use to determine the meaning of a written instrument such as a contract, will, or deed as represented solely by its textual content. The doctrine states that where there is an ambiguity of terms, the Court must rely on the written instrument solely and cannot consider extraneous evidence.

  7. Ohio lawsuit seeks rewrite of redistricting ballot language ...

    www.aol.com/news/ohio-lawsuit-seeks-rewrite...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in. Mail. ... LaRose pointed to those election results during the podcast as evidence Ohio’s system is working.

  8. Ohio lawsuit seeks rewrite of redistricting ballot language ...

    lite-qa.aol.com/news/health/story/0001/20240820/...

    That year, Republicans won 10 of Ohio’s 15 congressional seats under the unconstitutional U.S. House map, though Democrats netted several notable wins. The disputed Statehouse maps yielded even larger Republican supermajorities. LaRose pointed to those election results during the podcast as evidence Ohio’s system is working.

  9. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.