Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A map of the disputed Kashmir region showing the areas under Indian, Pakistani, and Chinese administration. On 5 August 2019, the government of India revoked the special status, or autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state which consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of dispute ...
Former prince regent and Congress leader Karan Singh opined that an integral review of Article 370 was overdue and, it need to be worked on jointly with the State of Jammu and Kashmir. [90] However, in October 2015, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir ruled that the Article 370 cannot be "abrogated, repealed or even amended." It explained that ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
On an appeal by S. R. Bommai, in a landmark judgement delivered in 1994, the Indian Supreme Court laid out the procedure to be followed before dissolving an elected assembly. The historic ruling in this case reduced the scope for misuse of Article 356 by future central governments and governors. 4 10 October 1990: 17 October 1990: 7 days
"Article 370 and The Paradox of Kashmir's Accession". The Wire; Soofi, Ahmer Bilal; Aziz, Jamal; Anwar, Muhammad Oves; Malik, Ayesha; Khan, Shayan Ahmed (2019), The Status of Jammu and Kashmir Under International Law. The Law of Occupation and Illegal Annexation. (PDF), Research Society of International Law, Pakistan
The final judgement in the Ayodhya dispute was declared by the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019. [4] The Supreme Court ordered the disputed land (2.77 acres) to be handed over to a trust (to be created by the government of India ) to build the Ram Janmabhoomi (revered as the birthplace of Hindu deity, Rama ) temple.
Judgement Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [22] 1978 A 'procedure' under Article 21 of the Constitution cannot be arbitrary, unfair, oppressive, or unreasonable. A law depriving a person of 'personal liberty' must not violate any of the Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. This judgement thus overruled A. K. Gopalan v.
" But the Article 370 clearly states that the provisions with respect to the state of Jammu and Kashmir are only temporary and not permanent ." Having said that, the very first head "purpose" states the following "Thus the Article has become a permanent feature of the Indian constitution, as confirmed by various rulings of the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, the ...