Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2011, the magazine was the subject of a Rs 50 crore defamation suit by the Indian Institute of Planning and Management after it featured a profile of its head, Arindam Chaudhuri. [15] The court awarded an interim injunction to Chaudhuri, ordering the magazine to take the article off its website.
Byju's (stylised as BYJU'S) is an Indian multinational educational technology company, headquartered in Bengaluru. [4] It was founded in 2011 by Byju Raveendran and Divya Gokulnath . As of October 2024, various media outlets reported that Byju's valuation has now plummeted to zero, down from its peak valuation of $22 billion in 2022.
The current Act is the Defamation Act 1992 which came into force on 1 February 1993 and repealed the Defamation Act 1954. [81] New Zealand law allows for the following remedies in an action for defamation: compensatory damages; an injunction to stop further publication; a correction or a retraction; and in certain cases, punitive damages.
The defamation case involved comments Gandhi made in a 2019 election spe. An Indian state court refused to stay opposition leader Rahul Gandhi’s conviction for criminal defamation in a ruling ...
On October 21, 2024, the article page regarding the ongoing court case (though not the article about ANI itself) was blanked and access to editing blocked by the Wikimedia Foundation due to the ongoing lawsuit. [3] [43] A number of authors have expressed concern about the case threatening freedom of speech in India. [44] [45]
Sahara India Pariwar moved Calcutta High Court in December 2013 seeking a stay and filed a Rs. 2 billion defamation suit against the author. In January 2014, a stay order was issued by the court. In January 2014, a stay order was issued by the court.
The Maharaj Libel Case tried in HM Queen Victoria's Supreme Court of Bombay was hailed at the time as “the most extraordinary of any case tried in any of Her Majesty’s Courts in India” [30] (The Indian Reformer, June 6, 1862, quoted in Mulji 1865, pp. App. 163). It was covered daily by medias in India and even in Europe as one of the ...
The suit accuses Giuliani of defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress — two of the same claims the plaintiffs successfully sued him for in the same federal courthouse.