enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: first sale doctrine pdf california form fillable print

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. First-sale doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-sale_doctrine

    The first-sale doctrine (also sometimes referred to as the "right of first sale" or the "first sale rule") is a legal concept that limits the rights of an intellectual property owner to control resale of products embodying its intellectual property. The doctrine enables the distribution chain of copyrighted products, library lending, giving ...

  3. Patent infringement under United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_infringement_under...

    The defense of invalidity is a counter-attack on the patent itself., i.e., the validity of the patent or of the allegedly infringed claims. Case law provides other defenses, such as the first-sale doctrine, the right to repair, and unenforceability because of inequitable conduct.

  4. Exhaustion doctrine under U.S. law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhaustion_doctrine_under...

    The exhaustion doctrine, also referred to as the first sale doctrine, [1] is a U.S. common law patent doctrine that limits the extent to which patent holders can control an individual article of a patented product after a so-called authorized sale. Under the doctrine, once an authorized sale of a patented article occurs, the patent holder's ...

  5. Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernor_v._Autodesk,_Inc.

    The district court found the precedents cited above to be in direct, irreconcilable conflict. Under the MAI, Triad, and Wall Data cases, the transfer of software from Autodesk accompanied by a restrictive license, would not be a sale and the first-sale doctrine would not apply, and thus Vernor would not be permitted to redistribute the software.

  6. Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobbs-Merrill_Co._v._Straus

    The court held first that the copyright statutes protect an owner's right to "multiply and sell" the work on their own terms. The statutory right to sell, however, did not also create a right to limit resale. The court did not hold that a contract or license imposed on the first sale could not

  7. Anti-competitive practices - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-competitive_practices

    Anti-competitive practices are commonly only deemed illegal when the practice results in a substantial dampening in competition, hence why for a firm to be punished for any form of anti-competitive behavior they generally need to be a monopoly or a dominant firm in a duopoly or oligopoly who has significant influence over the market.

  8. Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Records,_LLC_v...

    [6] Because ReDigi did not involve the actual physical copy being transferred but a new copy of the digital file, the court rejected the first-sale doctrine defense. The court reasoned that Capitol's reproduction right was violated when a new copy was created, thereby barring the defense of the first-sale doctrine. [19]

  9. Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirtsaeng_v._John_Wiley...

    John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 U.S. 519 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court copyright decision in which the Court held, 6–3, that the first-sale doctrine exhausts copyright of the works lawfully made or purchased abroad.

  1. Ad

    related to: first sale doctrine pdf california form fillable print