Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. 878 (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.
In fact, we have seen this large a departure from equal presidential impact only once before—the 1857 Supreme Court that decided Dred Scott and tore the nation apart. Read More: These Are the ...
(2) whether a sovereign's statutory, regulatory, or policy interest is a property interest when compliance is a material term of payment for goods or services; and (3) whether all contract rights are "property." June 17, 2024: December 9, 2024 Louisiana v. Callais: 24-109 24-110
(The Center Square) – Work-from-home policies implemented in the federal government during the COVID-19 pandemic have outlasted that era, but workers may be leaving their houses soon under ...
In the United States, qualified immunity is a legal principle of federal constitutional law that grants government officials performing discretionary (optional) functions immunity from lawsuits for damages unless the plaintiff shows that the official violated "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known". [1]
The U.S. Supreme Court’s term came to an end last month as the conservative majority released a slew of opinions that sparked widespread controversy and renewed the debate around court packing ...
The 2022 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 3, 2022, and concluded October 1, 2023. The table below illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion.
The recent firings of federal employees who were new to their jobs violate federal laws about merit-based hiring and layoffs, lawyers say.. The lawyers for a group of fired probationary workers ...