Ad
related to: summary judgment alberta
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Summary judgment procedures were first introduced in Canadian courts in the 1980s. [b] [c] Ontario, after a study on the issues of access to justice, [4] reformed its rules in 2010 to extend the powers of motion judges and masters for ordering summary judgment.
In law, a summary judgment, also referred to as judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition, [1] is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Summary judgments may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case.
Ernst v Alberta Energy Regulator [1] was a 2017 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada dealing with the extent to which damages are available as a remedy under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission), [1990] 2 SCR 489, is a leading human rights law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada.The Court expanded on the concept of accommodation up to undue hardship first established in Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd, [1985] 2 SCR 536 and provided a set of factors to consider when evaluating undue hardship.
In 1978, Nancy Lockhart and Michael Lasrado opened Big M Drug Mart, a 20,000 square foot (1,900 m 2) supermarket in the Forest Lawn community in Calgary. [3] Big M and other stores remained open on Sundays despite the prohibition in the Lord's Day Act as revenue exceeded the small fines of between $15–$40 ($64–$172 in 2023).
This brief addresses challenges raised in two separate summary judgment motions: the Plaintiffs’ motion in PEER v. Beaudreau2 and the Plaintiffs’ Motion in Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) v. Beaudreau. Amici focus on those issues on which they have greatest expertise.
On July 11 2022 a lawsuit was filed against Blevins (and other defendants) in the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta for failing to pay a $137,278.28 debt. [2] Additionally, on July 14 2023 the Alberta Court of Justice (Civil) granted a summary judgment against Nickalas Leslie Blevins and other defendants, finding them liable for a debt of $17,757.
Caron v Alberta, 2015 SCC 56 : February 13, 2015 November 20, 2015 Canadian Broadcasting Corp v SODRAC 2003 Inc, 2015 SCC 57 : March 16, 2015 November 26, 2015 1 2 B010 v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 58 : February 17, 2015 November 27, 2015 R v Appulonappa, 2015 SCC 59 : February 17, 2015 November 27, 2015 Case name
Ad
related to: summary judgment alberta