enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. AT&T (1982) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(1982)

    Laws applied. Sherman Antitrust Act. United States v. AT&T, 552 F.Supp. 131 (1982), was a ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, [ 1 ] that led to the 1984 Bell System divestiture, and the breakup of the old AT&T natural monopoly into seven regional Bell operating companies and a much smaller new version of AT&T.

  3. Breakup of the Bell System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

    The breakup of the Bell System resulted in the creation of seven independent companies that were formed from the original twenty-two AT&T-controlled members of the System. [5] On January 1, 1984, these companies were NYNEX, Pacific Telesis, Ameritech, Bell Atlantic, Southwestern Bell Corporation, BellSouth, and US West. NYNEX, merged with Bell ...

  4. United States antitrust law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law

    Sherman Act 1890 § 1 Preventing collusion and cartels that act in restraint of trade is an essential task of antitrust law. It reflects the view that each business has a duty to act independently on the market, and so earn its profits solely by providing better priced and quality products than its competitors. The Sherman Act §1 prohibits "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust ...

  5. AT&T - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T

    AT&T Inc., simply known as AT&T, an abbreviation for its former name, the American Telephone and Telegraph Company, is an American multinational telecommunications holding company headquartered at Whitacre Tower in Downtown Dallas, Texas. [4] It is the world's third-largest telecommunications company by revenue and the second-largest wireless ...

  6. United States v. AT&T (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(2019)

    Antitrust law. United States v. AT&T, 916 F.3d 1029 (2019), was a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, [ 1] which prevented the U.S. government from blocking a merger between AT&T and Time Warner, thus creating the WarnerMedia conglomerate. The court found that regulators were unable to prove harm ...

  7. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  8. United States v. AT&T - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T

    United States v. AT&T. United States v. AT&T may refer to several court cases: United States v. AT&T (1982), a lawsuit enforcing the divestiture of the Bell System. United States v. AT&T (2019), a lawsuit attempting to block a merger with Time Warner.

  9. AT&T, other phone companies sued over stolen nude images ...

    www.aol.com/news/t-other-phone-companies-sued...

    The latest lawsuit against AT&T was filed Monday in California state court. A woman identified as Jane Doe alleged that an employee at a Los Angeles store stole her nude images and distributed ...