Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This represents a significant change in juror management techniques, as it is probable that criminal trial jurors accused of misconduct have never been tried in this way. [21] Former jurors found guilty of one of the new offences will be disqualified from jury service for ten years, even if they have been fined rather than imprisoned. [22]
Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that juror testimony could not be used to discredit or overturn a jury verdict, even if the jury had been consuming copious amounts of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine throughout the course of the trial.
Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937), overruled by Benton v. ... Racial discrimination in the jury pool and venire. Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1880)
Judge cites 'juror misconduct', declares mistrial for man accused of Wendy Jerome murder. Gannett. Gary Craig, Rochester Democrat and Chronicle. December 6, 2023 at 10:37 AM. Wendy Jerome.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The jury in Fairfield County, Connecticut Superior Court also found that the company should pay additional punitive damages, which will be determined J&J must pay $15 million to man who says its ...
Strike for cause (also referred to as challenge for cause or removal for cause) is a method of eliminating potential members from a jury panel in the United States.. During the jury selection process, after voir dire, opposing attorneys may request removal of any juror who does not appear capable of rendering a fair and impartial verdict, in either determining guilt or innocence and/or a ...
“If there is evidence or concerns of juror misconduct, such as receiving outside information, discussing the case prematurely, or being influenced by external factors, jurors could potentially ...