Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The SCC's statement that an arm's-length price can fall within an acceptable range of prices has also been seen as significant, and consistent with the 2010 OECD transfer pricing guidelines, as it appears to be contrary to the long-standing policy of the Canada Revenue Agency to express a preference for unweighted yearly averages of comparators ...
Attorney-General for Ontario v Attorney-General of Canada (Reference Appeal) (Ontario, Canada) [1912] A.C. 571 Royal Bank of Canada v. The King [1913] A.C. 283 Canada v. Alberta [3] [1922] A.C. 191 Emergency doctrine of Constitution of Canada Fort Frances Pulp and Paper v. Manitoba Free Press (1923)
Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 is a leading Canadian contract law case, concerning good faith as a basic organizing principle in contractual relations in Canada's common law jurisdictions. Facts [ edit ]
The PDB is intended to keep the president informed on a wide range of issues, the best analysts write it and senior leaders review it. This, the "August 6 PDB", is at the center of much controversy for the USIC. The August 6 PDB began with not only a vague warning in the title, but also continued with vague warnings:
Canada (Director of Investigation and Research) v Southam Inc, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 748 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on judicial review.In this case the Court first set out the standard of review of "reasonableness simpliciter", which directs the court to only review decisions that are "not supported by any reasons that can stand up to a somewhat probing examination".
Mean opinion score (MOS) is a measure used in the domain of Quality of Experience and telecommunications engineering, representing overall quality of a stimulus or system. It is the arithmetic mean over all individual "values on a predefined scale that a subject assigns to his opinion of the performance of a system quality". [ 1 ]
The success of an IR system may be judged by a range of criteria including relevance, speed, user satisfaction, usability, efficiency and reliability. [2] Evaluation measures may be categorised in various ways including offline or online, user-based or system-based and include methods such as observed user behaviour, test collections, precision ...
The best argument for validation of expert judgment is the expert judgment data itself. Whereas the pre-2006 data contains wide variations in numbers of experts and numbers of calibration variables, the 33 independent professionally contracted post-2006 elicitations are more uniform in design, better resourced, better documented and better lend ...