Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Strict construction requires a judge to apply the text only as it is expressly written, i.e., read perfectly literally. This can contradict the commonly-understood meaning of a law. For example, consider a law that specifies "the use of a knife when committing a crime should be punished by ten years in prison."
In generative grammar and related approaches, the logical form (LF) of a linguistic expression is the variant of its syntactic structure which undergoes semantic interpretation. It is distinguished from phonetic form, the structure which corresponds to a sentence's pronunciation.
This leads to the rule of semantic interpretation that takes pronouns and changes them into bound variables. [1] This rule is abbreviated as Pro→BV, where "Pro" stands for pronoun, and "BV" stands for bound variable. Simple sentence example. 9) [Betsy i loves her i dog] The strict reading of sentence 9) is that "Betsy loves her own dog".
Hence, a native speaker would rate this sentence as odd, or unacceptable, because the meaning does not make sense according to the English lexicon. [6] Tree structure of the sentence "Colourless green ideas sleep furiously." Thus, for Chomsky a grammatical string is not necessarily a meaningful one.
The ambiguity in a locally ambiguous sentence briefly stays and is resolved, i.e., disambiguated, by the end of the speech. Sometimes, local ambiguities can result in "garden path" sentences, in which a structurally correct sentence is difficult to interpret because one interpretation of the ambiguous region is not the one that makes most sense.
By a "grammatical" sentence Chomsky means a sentence that is intuitively "acceptable to a native speaker". [9] It is a sentence pronounced with a "normal sentence intonation". It is also "recall[ed] much more quickly" and "learn[ed] much more easily". [61] Chomsky then analyzes further about the basis of "grammaticality."
Phrase structure showing NEG- raising licensing a strict NPI This suggests that the negation originates in the embedded clause, as sister to the VP breathe a word , thus satisfying the locality of selection, being in the embedded clause before participating in raising, moving first to spec CP, and then to its host in the main clause.
This means that if a sentence entails another sentence in the first logic, then the translation of the first sentence should entail the translation of the second sentence in the second logic. This way, a translation from one logic to another represents the formulas, proofs, and models of the first logic in terms of the second. [58]