Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The values for Nature journals lie well above the expected ca. 1:1 linear dependence because those journals contain a significant fraction of editorials. CiteScore was designed to compete with the two-year JCR impact factor, which is currently the most widely used journal metric. [7] [8] Their main differences are as follows: [9]
Journal Citation Reports (JCR) is an annual publication by Clarivate. [1] It has been integrated with the Web of Science and is accessed from the Web of Science Core Collection. It provides information about academic journals in the natural and social sciences, including impact factors. JCR was originally published as a part of the Science ...
Nature was one of the world's most cited scientific journals by the Science Edition of the 2022 Journal Citation Reports (with an ascribed impact factor of 50.5), [1] making it one of the world's most-read and most prestigious academic journals. [2] [3] [4] As of 2012, it claimed an online readership of about three million unique readers per month.
npj series. The Nature Partner Journals series, abbreviated npj, is a series of online-only, open access, journals.It was launched in April 2014 with three journals: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, and npj Schizophrenia.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in: . Science Citation Index Expanded [3]; Scopus [4]; According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2021 impact factor of 37.214, ranking it 2nd out of 279 journals in the category "Environmental Sciences" [5] and 1st out of 201 journals in the category "Geosciences, Multidisciplinary".
Nature Reviews Materials is a monthly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Nature Portfolio. It was established in 2016. [1] The journal covers all topics within materials science. It presents reviews and perspectives, which are commissioned by the editorial team. The editor-in-chief is Giulia Pacchioni. [2]
In response to growing concerns over the inappropriate use of journal impact factors in evaluating scientific outputs and scientists themselves, Université de Montréal, Imperial College London, PLOS, eLife, EMBO Journal, The Royal Society, Nature and Science proposed citation distributions metrics as alternative to impact factors. [32] [33] [34]
Use of the impact factor is not necessarily undesirable as it can reasonably incentivise editors to improve their journal through the publication of good science. Two well-known academic journals, Nature and Science, had impact factors of 36 and 31 respectively. A respected journal in a sub-field, such as cognitive science, might have an impact ...