Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Intuitionistic logic is related by duality to a paraconsistent logic known as Brazilian, anti-intuitionistic or dual-intuitionistic logic. [14] The subsystem of intuitionistic logic with the FALSE (resp. NOT-2) axiom removed is known as minimal logic and some differences have been elaborated on above.
A standard example of absurdity is found in dealing with arithmetic. Assume that 0 = 1, and proceed by mathematical induction : 0 = 0 by the axiom of equality. Now (induction hypothesis), if 0 were equal to a certain natural number n , then 1 would be equal to n + 1, ( Peano axiom : S m = S n if and only if m = n ), but since 0 = 1, therefore 0 ...
The fundamental distinguishing characteristic of intuitionism is its interpretation of what it means for a mathematical statement to be true. In Brouwer's original intuitionism, the truth of a mathematical statement is a subjective claim: a mathematical statement corresponds to a mental construction, and a mathematician can assert the truth of a statement only by verifying the validity of that ...
For simplicity, the logics presented so far have been intuitionistic. Classical logic extends intuitionistic logic with an additional axiom or principle of excluded middle: For any proposition p, the proposition p ∨ ¬p is true. This statement is not obviously either an introduction or an elimination; indeed, it involves two distinct connectives.
Jankov logic (KC) is an extension of intuitionistic logic, which can be axiomatized by the intuitionistic axiom system plus the axiom [13] ¬ A ∨ ¬ ¬ A . {\displaystyle \neg A\lor \neg \neg A.} Gödel–Dummett logic (LC) can be axiomatized over intuitionistic logic by adding the axiom [ 13 ]
Thus in intuitionistic logic proof by contradiction is not universally valid, but can only be applied to the ¬¬-stable propositions. An instance of such a proposition is a decidable one, i.e., satisfying . Indeed, the above proof that the law of excluded middle implies proof by contradiction can be repurposed to show that a decidable ...
For example, Gödel–Dummett logic has a simple semantic characterization in terms of total orders. Specific intermediate logics may be given by semantical description. Others are often given by adding one or more axioms to Intuitionistic logic (usually denoted as intuitionistic propositional calculus IPC, but also Int, IL or H) Examples include:
A more complex definition of hereditary Harrop formulae is used in logic programming as a generalisation of Horn clauses, and forms the basis for the language λProlog. Hereditary Harrop formulae are defined in terms of two (sometimes three) recursive sets of formulae. In one formulation: [4]